An article, published
online March 31, 2008, in the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation, entitled Hands-Only (Compression-Only)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Call to Action for Bystander Response to
Adults Who Experience Out-of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest. A Science Advisory
for the Public From the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular
Care Committee, has raised many
questions regarding the provision of CPR instructions in the dispatch
environment. Specifically, does this recommendation warrant an immediate change
to the CPR pre arrival instructions contained in the Academy approved Medical
Priority Dispatch System™ (MPDS)?
Current, MPDS protocol
is based on the recommendations of the Academy’s Special Resuscitation Council,
which was formed to consider the proposed 2005 ILCOR/AHA resuscitation
guidelines. This special resuscitation council published their DLS-specific
recommendations in May of 2005, in the journal Resuscitation.
The Academy’s Special
Resuscitation Council considered many aspects of the available research while
composing the dispatch CPR protocol including arrest etiology, time of collapse
to instruction and arrival of responders, the availability of professionally
delivered instructions versus layperson recall and performance, and
defibrillation intervention. These factors are very important considering they
are intricate to the recommendations produced by ILCOR and the AHA for
laypersons, BLS and ALS responders, and hospital staff. While the 2005 AHA
guidelines were very specific for these providers, they included only three,
short paragraphs specific to dispatch CPR, and a third of that was devoted to
recognizing agonal respirations. With the DLS standard unclear, it was up to
the Academy’s council to consider the evidence and create one.
This latest science
advisory from the AHA has been published to “…amend and clarify the “2005
American Heart Association
(AHA) Guidelines for
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC)”
for bystanders who witness an adult out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest.”
These new guidelines are not DLS specific in that they do not consider the
availability of professionally delivered pre-arrival instructions and they
emphasize layperson confidence, recall, and ability. The new guidelines summary
for adult victims of witnessed cardiac arrest is as follows:
When an adult
suddenly collapses, trained or untrained
bystanders
should—at a minimum—activate their community
emergency medical
response system (eg, call 911) and
provide
high-quality chest compressions by pushing hard and
fast in the center
of the chest, minimizing interruptions (Class I).
●
If a bystander is not trained in CPR, then the bystander should provide
hands-only CPR (Class IIa). The rescuer should continue hands-only CPR until an
automated external defibrillator arrives and is ready for use or EMS providers
take over care of the victim.
●
If a bystander was previously trained in CPR and is confident in his or her
ability to provide rescue breaths with minimal interruptions in chest
compressions, then the bystander should provide either conventional CPR using a
30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio (Class IIa) or hands-only CPR (Class
IIa). The rescuer should continue CPR until an automated external defibrillator
arrives and is ready for use or EMS providers take over care of the victim.
●
If the bystander was previously trained in CPR but is not confident in his
or her ability to provide conventional CPR
including
high-quality chest compressions (ie, compressions of adequate rate and depth
with minimal interruptions) with rescue breaths, then the bystander should give
hands-only CPR (Class IIa). The rescuer should continue hands-only CPR until an
automated external defibrillator arrives and is ready for use or EMS providers
take over the care of the victim.
When
considering these new recommendations it should be noted that the AHA Committee
“…has concluded that adult victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who
receive bystander hands-only
(compression-only) CPR
or conventional CPR have a similar
chance of survival.”
It is very important
to note that a primary motivation of the new recommendations is the recall
ability and motivation of bystanders in the cardiac arrest situation and these
considerations are clearly affected when instructions are provided by a trained
EMD.
The current version of
the MPDS is in line with the new recommendations in that a continuous sequence
of 400 uninterrupted compressions are provided for adult victims of presumed
cardiac arrest. The protocol considers the limitations stated in the new
guidelines including the limited performance and recall variations of
laypersons and the fact that “…there may be an interval after cardiac arrest
when ventilations become absolutely critical for survival.” As is emphasized in
the new guidelines, the protocol is designed to evaluate the cardiac arrest
patient and institute uninterrupted chest compressions as soon as possible.
The question that
remains, even after considering these new recommendations, is when in the CPR
sequence do ventilations become necessary for survival and, should this
endpoint be included in the dispatch protocol or be left to the responders?
Options include extending the initial 400 compressions to another finite number
or simply providing compressions-only until responders arrive.
The Academy’s Special
Resuscitation Council is charged with evaluating these new recommendations to
determine what, if any, changes to the MPDS are prudent. In the meantime,
protocol users can be assured that current protocol meets the latest DLS
standard, and is constantly being evaluated and refined in consideration of the
most recent research. If changes are deemed necessary, they will likely be
incorporated into version 12.0 of the MPDS, currently undergoing beta testing.